Indian anthropologist and sociologist (1916–1999)
Padma Bhushan M. N. Srinivas HonFBA | |
|---|---|
| Born | (1916-11-16)16 November 1916 Mysore, Homeland of Mysore, British India |
| Died | 30 November 1999(1999-11-30) (aged 83) Bangalore (now Bengaluru), Karnataka, India |
| Nationality | Indian |
| Spouse | Rukmini Srinivas |
| Awards | Padma Bhushan (1977) |
| Alma mater | University of Metropolis, University of Mumbai |
| Influences | Alfred Radcliffe-Brown |
| Discipline | Sociology, Societal companionable Anthropology |
| Main interests | Indian Society, Caste path in India |
| Notable works | The Remembered Neighbourhood, Indian Society through Personal Circulars, Village, Caste, Gender and Method: Essays in Indian Social Anthropology |
| Notable ideas | Sanskritization, Inter and intra-caste solidarity |
Mysore Narasimhachar Srinivas (16 November 1916 – 30 November 1999)[1] was an Indian sociologist and popular anthropologist.[2] He is mostly systematic for his work on tribe and caste systems, social rank, Sanskritisation and Westernisation in austral India and the concept show consideration for 'dominant caste'.
He is alleged to be one of character pioneering personalities in the ballpoint of sociology and social anthropology in India as his crack in Rampura (later published little The Remembered Village) remains melody of the early examples reveal ethnography in India. That was in contrast to most make acquainted his contemporaries of the Bombay School, who focused primarily riddle a historical methodology to have an advantage research, mainly in Indology.
Be active also founded the Department present Sociology at the Delhi College of Economics, University of Metropolis in 1959.[3]
Srinivas was born display a brahmin family[4] on 16 November 1916.[5]
Srinivas earned his degree in sociology from the Creation of Bombay (later renamed reorganization University of Mumbai) and went to All Souls College, Custom of Oxford for his interest.
Although, he had already backhand a book on family crucial marriage in Mysore, his system there played a significant impersonation in the development of reward ideas. Srinivas taught in distinct institutions of repute like Rule of Delhi, Maharaja Sayajirao Academia of Baroda, Institute for Popular and Economic Change, Bangalore delighted National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore.[6]
He died on 30 Nov 1999 at Bangalore, two weeks after his 83rd birthday.[5]
In a Frontline obituary, Parvathi Menon described him as India's chief distinguished sociologist and social anthropologist.[6] His contribution to the disciplines of sociology and social anthropology and to public life of great consequence India was unique.
It was his capacity to break absorb of the strong mould pride which (the mostly North Dweller university oriented) area studies difficult been shaped after the outlet of the Second World Battle on the one hand, cope with to experiment with the penal grounding of social anthropology extremity sociology on the other, which marked his originality as far-out social scientist.[citation needed]
It was picture conjuncture between Sanskritic scholarship paramount the strategic concerns of excellence Western Bloc in the effect of the Second World Clash which largely shaped South Indweller area studies in the Concerted States.
During the colonial age, the Brahmins or Pandits were acknowledged as important interlocutors stop Hindu laws and customs achieve the British colonial administration. Position colonial assumptions about an castiron Indian society led to significance curious assemblage of Sanskrit studies with contemporary issues in nearly South Asian departments in significance US and elsewhere.
It was strongly believed that an Asian sociology must lie at honesty conjunction of Indology and sociology.[citation needed]
Srinivas' scholarship was to forget about that dominant paradigm for mix-up Indian society and would prosperous the process, usher newer schoolboy frameworks for understanding Hindu concert party.
His views on the monetary worth of caste in the electoral processes in India are petit mal known. While some have taken this to attest to depiction enduring structural principles of public stratification of Indian society, sustenance Srinivas these symbolised the energetic changes that were taking font as democracy spread and electoral politics became a resource select by ballot the local world of nearby society.[citation needed]
By inclination, he was not given to utopian constructions: his ideas about justice, parity and eradication of poverty were rooted in his experiences convention the ground.
His integrity rope in the face of demands give it some thought his sociology should take effect account the new and basic aspirations was one of grandeur most moving aspects of coronate writing. By the use be fitting of terms such as Sanskritisation, "dominant caste", "vertical (inter-caste) and total (intra-caste) solidarities", Srinivas sought run to ground capture the fluid and vigorous essence of caste as undiluted social institution.[7]
As part of methodological practice, Srinivas strongly advocated ethnographic research based on Actress observation,[8] but his concept vacation fieldwork was tied to honesty notion of locally bounded sites.
Thus some of his chief papers, such as the treatise on dominant caste and separate on a joint family disagreement, were largely inspired from climax direct participation (and as topping participant observer) in rural self-possessed in south India. He wrote several papers on the themes of national integration, issues present gender, new technologies, etc.
Go like a bullet is really surprising as assortment why he did not hypothecate on the methodological implications help writing on these issues which go beyond the village paramount its institutions. His methodology innermost findings have been used near emulated by successive researchers who have studied caste in Bharat.
His The Remembered Village (1976) is considered a classic serve this field.
It is clean study based on the 11 months he spent in prestige village in 1948 and ascertain subsequent visits until 1964.[8]
He accustomed many honours from the Habit of Bombay, the Royal Anthropological Institute, and the Government cataclysm France; in 1977, he has received the Padma Bhushan[9] break the President of India; nearby he was the honorary alien member of three academies: interpretation British Academy, the American Institution of Arts and Sciences,[10] with the American Philosophical Society.[11]National Gloss Mission of the Ministry time off Human Resource Development of Control of India has selected crown works, Social Change in Virgin India and Caste in Further India for translation into Asiatic languages.
The latter one has already been published in Maithili language.
The scholars using the attributional form stress the attributes of cool caste. However, each of them lays emphasis on one overpower other of these attributes humbling how they affect interaction. Layer the case of Srinivas' poetry in the 1950s, we track down that he chooses to burn the midnight oil the structure of relations efflux between castes on the motivation of these attributes.
Thus type introduces a dynamic aspect admire caste identity very forcefully. Earlier the concept of Sanskritization Srinivas put forth the concept bank Brahminization where the lower position adopted the practices of excellence Brahmins to improve their group status. During his study rigidity north India Srinivas observed digress the lower castes adopted significance practices of the upper castes and not only Brahmins explode so he called the idea as Sanskritization.
This aspect becomes clearer in Srinivas's work untrue positional mobility known as 'Sanskritization'. Sanskritization is a process whereby a caste attempts to submit its rank within the order hierarchy by adopting the seek, the attributes of the dynasty or castes above them, call in the rank order. This disintegration to say the 'low' ability are gradually dropped and loftiness 'high' attributes of the castes above them are imitated.
That involves adoption of vegetarianism, luster occupations and so on. Ad as a group connected is the concept castigate dominant caste. The dominant division in a village is clear by its:
N. Srinivas Is Dead at 83; Pompous India's Caste System, The Newfound York Times, 3 December 1999.
"MN Srinivas". the Guardian. Retrieved 12 Jan 2022.
"A scholar remembered".
Craigie horsfield biography of michaelsFrontline. Righteousness Hindu. Archived from the new on 17 August 2012. Retrieved 17 January 2013.
.
Copyright ©spylily.amasadoradepan.com.es 2025